Behavior of factor of generating, Art of Effect.

With development of the Glass Bead Game,
I complemented explanation of the first scheme method.

The bases of how to use the glass beads are also shown.

The intellectual property
which I have agreed to use to countries and people in the world
is shown by the linked page.
http://glass-bead-game.potential-performers.com/g-scheme-method.html




By the first scheme method of the Glass Bead Game,
universality is practiced as use of nature of purpose in each item
for the symbols, a principles, and existence.

The nature of practice of this universality
connects three sets of the first scheme method.

By the transcendence obtained by practice of the symbols,
the principles, and existence,
the border of practical use of various cultural property disappears.

This transcendence manifests links to each scheme.
It is because composition is shown
in each scheme and the objectivity in shift of composition
from a composition is reflected to the nature by practice.






Each scheme is assigned to the glass beads of various colors
in use of the glass beads.
Although the definition is free, since it is general,
red, green, and blue have been used in my sites.

At the same time, the glass bead the form of phenomena,
such as time and space, is used independently.
The light-blue glass bead has been used in my sites.

Furthermore, the glass bead which means change independently
about the form of a phenomenon is used at the same time.
The yellow glass bead has been used in my sites.

The big glass bead has been used as each actual existence,
and the small glass bead has been used as each factor.

As expression of causality of each glass bead, as used generally,
the form of the axis of coordinates and the clockwise rotation
have been used with composing.




(C) Copyright 2011-2016 Kyo Nissho. All rights reserved.

18 years have elapsed since the first scheme method
of the Glass Bead Game was born.

When it was uncovered to the public in 2011,
it was natural that the basis of possibility exists in me.

I think that there may be explanation a little more
about the view of the scheme method although much actual usage
has been shown.
Besides, what is not used now was remembered
by the view of the time of the first scheme method birth.

I improve the page after several days.


(C) Copyright 2016 Kyo Nissho. All rights reserved.

The reaction in the actual force which constitutes change,
and the reaction confirmed as information by my blog etc.
became motivation as a whole,
I imagined how people would do the Glass Bead Game.

When the first scheme method was considered again,
it was felt for a while that I was in a maze.
Progress of the second scheme method was felt
to be too vast to the feeling.

The meaning of nature of purpose was gained
after the feeling again.

Technique has always evolved.
The evolution gives a meaning to essence.
However, to the custom,
I had entrusted the meaning given of the essence
to the first technique (the first scheme method)
that transcended the boundary of possible and impossible.

"Although used, feeling has not responded."
I remember that it narrowed the range of practice of application
of the first scheme method.

Actual progress of life was felt dissociated from my feeling,
because the range of my consciousness was narrow by the custom
about use of the first scheme method for having opened
to the public.

Acquisition of a high order technique has a meaning.
On the other hand,
I was conscious that I should be careful
that the essence is existing also in the initial technique.

By the first about 10 times using the first scheme method,
I had taken time to play one Glass Bead Game about one month.
Although evolution is important,
essential practice should be conscious always.


(C) Copyright 2016 Kyo Nissho. All rights reserved.